NOPSEMA Program Review Report: Response to Observations and Improvements Conclusions of the Reviewer: Overall, the Reviewer determined that the Program commitments have been met du

Epbc Review Response

  • GOVERNMENT RESPONSE TO THE INDEPENDENT REVIEW OF THE ...
  • Government Response: Inquiry into the operation of the ...
  • EPBC Response to Public Submissions
  • GOVERNMENT RESPONSE TO THE INDEPENDENT REVIEW OF THE ...

    GOVERNMENT RESPONSE TO THE INDEPENDENT REVIEW OF THE ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION AND BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION ACT 1999 REGULATION IMPACT STATEMENT . 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1) BACKGROUND ... The Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) is the This guide is designed to support Movement for Life teams, leaders, and community members in making submissions into the 2019-2020 EPBC Review. This guide has been developed to compliment the support of your well trained Movement for Life Community Organisers and your local Movement for Life teams.

    Home · Basic Portal

    The EPBC Act provides for a public comment period of 10 business days (with no extensions). A decision on whether a proposed action requires approval will be made within 20 business days. The outcome of the decision will be made publicly available on the web site. The proposed action explicitly excludes the disposal of dredge material offshore in the ... Australia and the State of Queensland established under section 45 of the EPBC Act (the Bilateral Agreement). ... E9 The Australian Government Response to: The independent review of the Port

    EPBC Act Review: Make a submission on the discussion paper ...

    EPBC Act Review: Make a submission on the discussion paper Closes 17 Apr 2020. This service needs cookies enabled. Consultation Contents. Our preference is to receive written contributions through this online form. The questions in this form have been extracted from the ... Response; 1. About you: Response to the review of the EPBC Act – Regulation Impact Statement – Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities. Aust Gov. 12th September 2011. On 24 August the Australian Government announced its response to the 10 year review of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999. The ... Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 ... Act No. 91 of 1999 as amended, taking into account amendments up to Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Amendment (Cost Recovery) Act 2014: An Act relating to the protection of the environment and the conservation of biodiversity, and for related purposes ...

    EPBC Amendment (Standing) Bill 2015 Who should have ...

    or project approval under the EPBC Act (Hawke Review, 15.38). The Hawke Review recommended that standing for merits review be extended to persons who made a formal comment during the decision-making process (Recommendation 50). However, the former Government’s 2011 response to the Hawke Review rejected this recommendation.12 Springvale EPBC 2013/6881 Annual Compliance Report Page 3 of 15 1. INTRODUCTION Springvale Coal Pty Ltd (Springvale) is an underground longwall mine located 12km North West of Lithgow in NSW and 3 km south of the Centennial Angus Place Mine. The mine is a joint venture owned in equal share by Centennial Springvale Pty Ltd (a wholly owned

    2015 EPBC Act Streamlining Review » NOPSEMA

    The review identified a range of opportunities for improvement, which NOPSEMA has accepted and is implementing. These are included in the Program Review Report – NOPSEMA Response to observations and improvements. On 4 September 2015, the Minister for the Environment’s delegate endorsed the EPBC Act Streamlining Review Report. The Department has published a formal response to the Regulatory Maturity Project review and established a Regulatory Steering Committee to oversee a program of work over the next 12–18 months. The Department has already completed actions to address several priority recommendations and has measures in place to address the remainder.

    NOPSEMA Program Review Report: Response to Observations ...

    NOPSEMA Program Review Report: Response to Observations and Improvements Conclusions of the Reviewer: Overall, the Reviewer determined that the Program commitments have been met during the review period; and the required processes and procedures are in place for Program commitments to continue to be met in the future. (EPBC Act). The referral covers some, but not all, aspects of roposed redevelopment of a p the Australian War Memorial, Campbell ACT, that was announced by the Prime Minister on 18 November 2019. This review will form part of the submissionInstitute’s in response to the Department of

    Government Response: Inquiry into the operation of the ...

    EPBC Act are already sufficiently clear and that there is no need to change them at the present time. See also the response to Recommendations 1 and 3 ofthe Review Report. 2. The committee recommends Noted that the appropriateness ofa See the government response to greenhouse trigger under the Act Recommendation 10 ofthe Review Report. 2. Opportunities for Public Comment. Comments are invited on whether or not a Referral is a ‘controlled action’ under the Act. When a project is referred for assessment under the EPBC Act, the Minister must open public consultation on whether the project is a controlled action and should therefore be assessed under the EPBC Act. Independent Review of the EPBC Act – 30 January 2009 . 1. Introduction . 1. The Australian Human Rights Commission (the Commission) makes this submission to Mr Allan Hawke in response to the Independent review of the . Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999. 2. The Commission acknowledges that this Independent review of ...

    Joint Government Response to the

    development of its response of the EPBC Review Act Executive Management of the NSW forest agencies. Joint Government Response Both Parties support the inclusion of the submissions provided to this first five yearly review being referred to the relevant reviews outside of the RFA review process. This factsheet outlines public comment opportunities and possible legal actions arising where a project is referred for federal assessment under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cth) (EPBC Act).. This Factsheet is for general information purposes only, it is not legal advice.

    Australian Government response to the Report of the ...

    About the response. The purpose of this government response is three-fold: This document provides a formal response to the 71 recommendations and several of the findings made in the Report of the independent review of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (the Report), including an explanation of the policy behind each response. Australian Labor Party Senators' Dissenting Report . 1.1 In 2011, the then Labor Government released its response to the Independent Review of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (commonly referred to as the 'Hawke Review'). #Grassgate timeline: Before we examine whether the review was “independent” as claimed, let’s roll out the chronology of events of the scandal known as #Grassgate which led to the push for the EPBC review. Summaries can also be found here and here.. 2000: Temperate grassland of the South Eastern Highlands in NSW declared endangered when the EPBC Act is introduced.

    Review of Commonwealth environmental laws – EPBC Act ...

    Last week, the Discussion Paper relating to the Independent Review of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) was released for public consultation.. The Discussion Paper outlines potential areas of focus for the review and floats potential options for reform. EPBC Act, it is an offence under section 74M to take the action while the decision ... form of a desktop document review and may include a site inspection, if necessary. In some cases, the document review provides the ... response to comments (if applicable ) +

    KWM | The EPBC Act Musical – time for the next part or a ...

    Hawke Review Recommendation . Australian Government Response. Status of Recommendation. Australian Environment Act. Repeal of the EPBC Act and replacement with the Australian Environment Act to be structured and drafted to modernise, simplify and streamline language and process. Hawke review epbc act australia map. ... The Australian Human Rights Commission (the Commission) makes this Hawke in response to the Independent review of the Environment Conservation Act (EPBC Act) which commenced on 16 July , is the. Abstract Australia has one of the worst extinction rates of any nation, yet Our analysis showed that the EPBC ... research essay is the effectiveness of the environmental protection and biodiversity conservation act (cth) reduced due to its lack of enforcement and inability

    Submissions guidelines | Independent review of the EPBC Act

    The review will seek information on a voluntary basis, by inviting participation, comments and submissions from interested parties. Information (including confidential information) collected during the review may be viewed by the Reviewer and Expert Panel, Department of the Environment and Energy staff, and contractors and consultants involved in the delivery of the review. After the entire the EPBC Act Review process and a year after the Australian Government’s response to it, on 31 October 2012 the Australian Senate this time set up yet another review into the Effectiveness of Threatened Species and Ecological Communities’ Protection in Australia. It commissioned a Senate Standing Committee on Environment ... The review of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 has now commenced, with submissions in response to the discussion paper due 14th Feb 2020.. The Review of the EPBC Act is a rare opportunity to influence and improve our regulatory framework in order to enhance environmental protection in Australia.

    Public Environmental Review Response to ...

    Governments at a Public Environmental Review (PER) level of assessment. The Project includes the following areas of infrastructure as described in greater detail in the PER and Chapter 1 of this document: • Operational Area – The granted Mining Leases surrounding the proposed gold mine including the pit(s), BLACKSMITH PILBARA IRON ORE PROJECT (EPBC 2011/6152) RESPONSE TO DSEWPAC REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION \\perworfil1\infstruclib\projects\201012-00322 fms vip\2.0 reports\1. dsewpac response\8. rev 0\response to dsewpac information request_rev 0.docx Page 4 201012-00322-000-EN-REP-0007 : Rev 0 : 18-Jun-12 2.

    EPBC Response to Public Submissions

    EPBC Response to Public Submissions Reference Issue Proponent’s Response 1.4 One submission commented that bush corridors will be degraded over time as a result of increased human population and litter. Areas of remnant vegetation will be fenced to prevent human access outside of designated areas. Anyone who deals with the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cth) (EPBC Act) will know that these are appropriate descriptors. So, it is not surprising then that the Final Report of the Independent Hawke Review of the EPBC Act (Hawke Review) has reached the same conclusion as those of us in practice. Australia Environment Norton Rose Fulbright Australia 19 Feb 2010

    Twenty Years of the EPBC Act – looking back, looking ...

    In a time of climate change, extinction and growing uncertainty, is the EPBC Act still fit for purpose? As is appropriate for such a critical piece of law, the EPBC Act gets a statutory review every 10 years. That means the EPBC Act is up for its second review later this year. Does it need a little tinkering or a major overhaul? For this reason, proponents and developers must continue to carefully manage EPBC Act issues when undertaking projects in Australia. Four main changes to the EPBC Act. The Government Response, which has the broad support of the Coalition, does not commit to drafting an entirely new EPBC Act, as recommended by the Hawke Review. However, it ... The Department of the Environment is responsible for administering the EPBC Act on behalf of the Environment Minister. The EPBC Act was independently reviewed in 2008 by Dr Allan Hawke. The EPBC Review recommendations report was released in 2009, with a subsequent government response in 2011.

    First Independent review of the Environment Protection and ...

    The first independent review of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act), commenced on 31 October 2008 and was delivered to the Minister on 30 October 2009.. Summary of the first EPBC Act Review process:. Click on a heading below or Show all | Hide all About the review The recommendations of the Report of the Independent Review of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (the Review Report) have taken into account the recommendations of the Senate Inquiry. The Australian Government Response to the Senate Inquiry is based on the Australian Government Response to the Review Report. submission to Mr Allan Hawke in response to the Independent review of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999. The Commission acknowledges that this Independent review of the EPBC Act is in accordance with s 522A of the Act. Section 552A requires that an independent

    Conservationists fear being locked out of review into how ...

    The Federal Government today announced an independent review into the interaction between agriculture and the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act). “It’s the Feds” - EPBC Act compliance and enforcement : ... • Note internal review of controlled action decision available (s.78), judicial review and injunctions in Federal Court - actions by environmental interest groups (but ... • Proactive response –quickly engage an expert to understand potential damage,

    Independent review of the EPBC Act

    3.2 The 2009 Hawke Review and the role of Local Government The first statutory review of the EPBC Act completed in 2009 and carried out by Alan Hawke (the Hawke Review) made 71 recommendations. The Australian Government’s 2011 response to the Review was framed around four key themes: There are five EPBC listed communities impacted by the fires (Table 10). Currently, there has been limited ... the response and recovery (including allocation of funding) and oversight through DELWP. ... There is an important opportunity to review and build on the strengths of existing projects, and also to ...

    Discussion Paper | Independent review of the EPBC Act

    I am pleased to have been asked to undertake the second independent review of Australia’s primary national environmental law, the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999, also known as the EPBC Act.. Australia’s environment is essential to our cultural identity, our way of life, our economy and the prosperity of our society. The Intergovernmental Agreement on Biosecurity (IGAB), which commenced in 2012, is an agreement between the Commonwealth, state and territory governments (except Tasmania) to strengthen the national biosecurity system.It defines the roles and responsibilities of governments and outlines the priority areas for collaboration to minimise the impact of pests and diseases on Australia’s economy ... The EPBC Act Musical - time for the next part or a sequel? King & Wood Mallesons ... The response to the Hawke review: federal environmental law to be reformed, not re-written *

    EPBC Act Review: Make a submission on the discussion paper ...

    EPBC Act Review Secretariat. 1800 065 823. ... Please read the discussion paper and prepare your submission as a response to the specific questions and broad questions asked. Additional information and background on the EPBC Act are available as well as further information on the review process. We considered the Australian Government response to the first independent review of the EPBC Act in our July update. Timeline of Review . The Australian Government has proposed the following indicative timeline for the Review. It is expected that Professor Samuel AC will provide his report to the Minister within the next 12 months: Next Steps By Peter Burnett and Philip Gibbons. Wendy Craik’s review of the impact of national environmental law on farmers (Craik Review) was released quietly late last week by new federal environment minister Sussan Ley, nine months after it was received by her predecessor, Melissa Price.(That law, of course, is the Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999, or EPBC Act.



    The first independent review of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act), commenced on 31 October 2008 and was delivered to the Minister on 30 October 2009.. Summary of the first EPBC Act Review process:. Click on a heading below or Show all | Hide all About the review About the response. The purpose of this government response is three-fold: This document provides a formal response to the 71 recommendations and several of the findings made in the Report of the independent review of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (the Report), including an explanation of the policy behind each response. EPBC Act Review Secretariat. 1800 065 823. . Please read the discussion paper and prepare your submission as a response to the specific questions and broad questions asked. Additional information and background on the EPBC Act are available as well as further information on the review process. EPBC Act Review: Make a submission on the discussion paper Closes 17 Apr 2020. This service needs cookies enabled. Consultation Contents. Our preference is to receive written contributions through this online form. The questions in this form have been extracted from the . Response; 1. About you: I am pleased to have been asked to undertake the second independent review of Australia’s primary national environmental law, the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999, also known as the EPBC Act.. Australia’s environment is essential to our cultural identity, our way of life, our economy and the prosperity of our society. Hawke Review Recommendation . Australian Government Response. Status of Recommendation. Australian Environment Act. Repeal of the EPBC Act and replacement with the Australian Environment Act to be structured and drafted to modernise, simplify and streamline language and process. EPBC Act are already sufficiently clear and that there is no need to change them at the present time. See also the response to Recommendations 1 and 3 ofthe Review Report. 2. The committee recommends Noted that the appropriateness ofa See the government response to greenhouse trigger under the Act Recommendation 10 ofthe Review Report. In a time of climate change, extinction and growing uncertainty, is the EPBC Act still fit for purpose? As is appropriate for such a critical piece of law, the EPBC Act gets a statutory review every 10 years. That means the EPBC Act is up for its second review later this year. Does it need a little tinkering or a major overhaul? The review will seek information on a voluntary basis, by inviting participation, comments and submissions from interested parties. Information (including confidential information) collected during the review may be viewed by the Reviewer and Expert Panel, Department of the Environment and Energy staff, and contractors and consultants involved in the delivery of the review. The review identified a range of opportunities for improvement, which NOPSEMA has accepted and is implementing. These are included in the Program Review Report – NOPSEMA Response to observations and improvements. On 4 September 2015, the Minister for the Environment’s delegate endorsed the EPBC Act Streamlining Review Report. 3.2 The 2009 Hawke Review and the role of Local Government The first statutory review of the EPBC Act completed in 2009 and carried out by Alan Hawke (the Hawke Review) made 71 recommendations. The Australian Government’s 2011 response to the Review was framed around four key themes:

    83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113

    Epbc Review Response © 2020 NOPSEMA Program Review Report: Response to Observations and Improvements Conclusions of the Reviewer: Overall, the Reviewer determined that the Program commitments have been met du